Case Study Analysis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Case Study Analysis - Assignment Example of the greatest ironies surrounding the release of the drug into the public domain was that some of the major personnel in FDA such as Merk were aware of the possible threats that were associated with the use of the drug were quite adamant to make it known (Richwine, 2004, November 18). They knew the drug increased risks of heart attack that made it pose as a great threat to public use. However, Charles Grassley one of the primary leaders in FDA initiated research to investigate the risks associated with the use of Rofecobix drug (Topol, 2004). In the course of this research, Dr. David Graham an FDA reviewer discovered the risks associated with the use of the drug, and made a publication without obtaining any clearance from the FDA committee (PhamaLot, 2011, August 28). The primary leadership of FDA has a number of shortcomings most of which contributed to the clearing the drug for public use. The chairperson of the FDA committee Charles Grassley equally raised concern that the relationship that existed between the drug companies and FDA was cozy and, therefore, could not provide room for the establishment of proper control over the drugs cleared (Topol, 2004). Some committee members have also been faulted for knowingly allowing the clearance of the drug and not warning people of the impending risks associated with the use of rofecobix. In addition, when David Graham published his findings, he was faulted by the acting commissioner of FDA, Lester Crawford, stating that Graham did not follow the correct procedures in making publication of his findings report (Richwine, 2004, November 18). Grassley, on the other hand, is on the opinion that Lester Crawford wanted to intimidate, Graham the reviewer and, therefore, his statements were purely meant to i ntimidate the witness before hearing (PhamaLot, 2011, August 28). The above crisis represents a management dilemma, which results into confusion and inconsistency in the nature of research provided. The primary leaders

Evaluate how Napoleon both continued and broke from the aims of his Essay

Evaluate how Napoleon both continued and broke from the aims of his revolutionary predecessors - Essay Example Due to these successful statistics, Napoleon is regarded as one of the shrewdest and greatest military commanders that the world has ever seen and it is for this reason that his military campaigns are studied at different military academies worldwide. In 1799, Napoleon replaced the French directory with French Consulate and became the First Consul. He was 5 years later proclaimed as the emperor by the French Senate after a plebiscite in his favor. From 1900 to 1910, the French Empire was besieged with a number of conflicts known as the Napoleonic Wars which involved all the major European powers (Schom). After several victories, France had held an extremely powerful and dominant position in Europe. Napoleon maintained this French influence by forming extensive alliances and by appointing various many family members and friends to rule over different European states as French client states. The turning point of napoleon’s fame and success was the war of Peninsula and the 1812 i nvasion of Russia by the French armies. Despite major success in these wars, napoleon army was badly injured in these invasions ad was unable to fully recover from the blows from the war. This marked the downfall of Napoleon’s success. ... The next six years of Napoleon lives were spent in British confinement on the island of Saint Helena. It was concluded on the basis of an autopsy that Hitler died of stomach cancer despite major debates around the cause of his death, for some scholars firmly believe that Napoleon was poisoned by arsenic. When looking to answer the question of how Napoleon was different from his predecessors, the major difference is the Civil Code that was invented by Napoleon. Ever since the prevalence of in France, there has never been a single body of standard regulating the country. This was a cause of many problems in various parts of the country and created rather unjust and unfair legal situations especially where the poor were concerned. The Napoleonic Code based mostly on the Roman Law, Justinian’s Code. The code basically separated Civil Law into three different categories; the personal category, the status category and the property and the acquisition of property category. These thre e were also the main morals of the entire French Revolution. French revolutionaries wanted the entire country to be standing on equal footing regardless of anyone’s monetary status. It was the Napoleonic Code that ensured that everyone had a chance to earn themselves money and a status. Every country in Europe other than Denmark, Great Britain, Norway, Russia and Sweden have based parts of their laws on one or another aspect of the Napoleonic Code (The Napoleonic Code). The Code is still used to date in several former French colonies like Louisiana and Quebec. The Napoleonic Code was perhaps the greatest civil achievement of Napoleon’s. This code was the embodiment of the entire French revolution. It was Napoleon’s code that was responsible for

Civil Liability and Self-Defence Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Civil Liability and Self-Defence - Case Study Example On the basis of the attendant facts, it would appear on the surface that Alex committed a criminal act. Incidentally, this is not so in the case at bar. To prove a crime, two elements are required to be present. Firstly, there must be the external or criminal act, called actus reus in Latin. The second element is the malicious intent on the part of the actor, the Latin mens rea. In order to obtain a conviction, these two essential requisites must be established with proof beyond reasonable doubt.1 When Alex returned from her coffee break and found out Bill taking away a computer and trying to get another one, what was on her mind was that Bill, whom she does not know, was stealing the properties of her temporary employer, Pumps and Pipes, whose right or interest she would naturally try to protect. Indeed, Alex attempted to so do by hitting Bill in the stomach. Otherwise stated, there was no malicious intent or criminal design on her part to unjustifiably or unreasonably cause injury to Bill when she executed the assault. There was therefore no mens rea as there was no definite mind-set and clear objective to effect and perform a criminal act on the part of Alex against Bill and this is particularly true in the case at bar when she did not mean any harm more severe than what was only needed to avert what she believed was the illegal taking of the computers. The honest fear and apprehension of Alex were demonstrated by h... However, the question now is whether or not the act of defending and the extent of it were reasonable and justified. In the case of Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] 2 W.L.R. 975, one issue which was resolved by the House of Lords was the question as to whether or not a defendant can claim self-defence when he had mistakenly albeit honestly perceived that it was necessary to defend himself against a clear danger even if the wrong belief was not reasonable.2 The decision in that suit enunciated that in a civil action for battery, as in the present situation, the burden of proof is on the defendant to convincingly show that not only was his belief honest but that it was reasonable. Under the circumstances, Alex does not qualify to put up self-defence as far as concerning the civil aspect. While she may be justified in assessing that Bill would commit an offence against the property right of her intermittent employer, the force or manner of defending that right did not ap pear reasonable. She could have just instead run away immediately, locked the doors and called out for assistance like what she did without unnecessarily hitting Bill. The events in the instant case find relevance in one not so old development. There had been moves to challenge and or to make clear the law on self defence. A farmer was adjudged to suffer the penalty of a life sentence following his alleged murder of a teen-aged intruder. No less than a police authority head rallied for a demand to put greater clarity in the law on self defence. It was charged that lawmakers must address this concern in order to give householders what real and specific right did they have

Engineering Principles, Electrical Networks Assignment

Engineering Principles, Electrical Networks - Assignment Example Question 1 1.1 Calculate line and phase currents? Given: 3 x 80â„ ¦ resistors star connected 415 v three phase supply 50 Hz frequency IL= V/R IL = 415 / 80 IL = 5.18 A In a star connected load IL = Iph Iph = 5.18 A 1.2 Total power dissipated by load? P = √3 x VL x IL x Cos ∂ Taking Power Factor (Cos ∂) as 0.85, P will be: P = √3 x 415 x 5.18 x 0.85 P = 3164.88 Watt 1.3 The power dissipated if, due to fault, one phase of the load went open Circuit? P = 2 x VL/√3 x IL cos ∂ P = 2 x 414/√3 x 5.18 x 0.85 P = 2109.92 Watt Question 2 Given: Delta connected load Power Factor 0.8 lagging P = 4080 Watt 425 V supply 50 Hz frequency 2.1 Calculate resistance and reactance of each phase? In Delta Connected load Vph = VL This P = √3 x VL x IL x Cos ∂ 4080 = √3 x425 x IL x 0.8 Iph = 4080/(√3 x425 x IL x 0.8) Iph = 6.93 A R = V*2 / P â„ ¦ R = 415*2/4080 R = 44.27 â„ ¦ Apparent Power S = P/pf S = 4080 / 0.8 S = 5100 Watt Reactive Power Q = √(S*2 – P*2) Q = √(5100*2 – 4080*2) Q = 3060 Watt Inductance XL = V*2/Q XL = 425*2/3060 XL = 59.02 â„ ¦ 2.1 Calculate Line current if same load was connected to star? Delta IL = P/V Delta IL = 4080/425 Delta IL = 9.6 A In Star IL = Iph Star IL = 9.6A Question 3 Given: Balanced 10 kW three phase load 415 V three wire supply 18 A line current 3.1 determine Load Power Factor Power Factor = True Power/Apparent Power = P/Q This: P = V x I Watts P = 415 x 18 P = 7470 Watts S (apparent Power) = 10000 Watt PF = 7470 / 10000 PF = 0.75 Question 4 Given: Star connected induction motor Supply 415 V Frequency 50 Hz

The experience of inactive nurses returned to nursing after completing Article - 1

The experience of inactive nurses returned to nursing after completing a refresher course - Article Example ongruence, analytical and integrative preciseness, philosophical or theoretical connectedness and heuristic relevance, as proposed by Burns and Grove (2007). Vividness. Clear statements about the purpose of the study, as well as, its significance are very crucial is writing research. Aside from the fact that these components are in the front line of a research paper, it is essential that is proponents underscore the rationale why such study be pursued. Upon reviewing the article â€Å"The Experience of Inactive Nurses Returned to Nursing after Completing a Refresher Course†, it can be observed that the author has stated the study purpose (page 359-360) in a direct, clear and measurable way. However, the significant of the study was not presented. The studys significance is supposed to explain how the research produces an original contribution to nursings body of knowledge. Without a strong theoretical Methodological Congruence. In this portion, a recruitment strategy is very necessary; it is a project-specific plan intended for identifying and enrolling the target people to participate in a research study and the plan must specify criteria for the screening of potential participants or the number of people who will be recruited, their location, as well as the approach to be employed (Mack, Woodsong, Macqueen, Guest and Namey, 2005; p. 6). In the research article, the authors were able to describe their background as nursing graduates, which is a good manifestation of their expertise in the chosen topic. They describe further who the participants are and how many they were, base on the study’s research objectives and the characteristics of the research. The author also emphasized the step-by-step procedures in contacting the participants and identified their specific locations. There was also a clear demonstration of ethical considerations in research conduct. Any investiga tor who conducts research involving human participants needs to uphold protection of

Edcaution Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Edcaution - Assignment Example Secondly, designers of norm-referenced tests should pick the content taught in the many schools, in the country. This is especially in the case of nationwide or district-wide examinations. Essay questions, true or false tests, matching questions, definition and open-ended questions are examples of criterion-referenced tests. They measure a student’s level of competence based on a preset standard without comparing him or her with peers. The objectives of the course and the curriculum inform the setting of criterion-referenced tests. These tests are most helpful when they measure students’ ability in given areas. There exists a need to ensure high validity and reliability of these tests. Firstly, designers of these tests should ensure that they pick the content matching the objectives of the course and the standards of the curriculum (Popham, 2008). A big cluster around the high end of the grading system shows many students met the standards. Secondly, the designers of these tests should suspend their biases. Bias-free tests are fair to all students regardless of gender, ethnic background, race and socio-economic status. High-stakes tests are another group of tests besides norm-referenced tests. The outcomes of these tests serve to make important decisions in people’s lives. A licensure examination is an example of a high-stakes test. This is because the results of the examination help decide the possibility of an examinee getting a permit to practice as a professional nurse (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2007). Because the results of high-stakes tests determine whether individuals get permits to do something or not, they need high reliability and validity. Speed tests measure the rate at which individuals can perform a given task. The test measures the speed of performance only and not the knowledge of individuals. There is a possibility of misusing

IM Not Scared Essay Example for Free

IM Not Scared Essay In comparison to his peers Michele reveals a level of maturity that his friends do not have. He defends Barbara before Skull can obscenely exploit her. Barbara is constantly harassed for being the only girl in the ‘gang’. Not even Michele could comprehend ‘how she put up’ with them, assuming it was the ‘fear of being left alone’. Barbara as well as Michele, is too innocent to distinguish the best for their own wellbeing. Michele has morals and instinctively knew that ‘there was something dirty’ with Barbara’s punishment. Unlike Michele, Skull has no remorse. Skull has the audacity to abuse people as he desires. Michele does not engage is exploiting others, in fact he obtains the rational reasoning of an educated adult. The most imperative case in which Michele expresses maturity is when he discovers Filippo. Initially Michele acts childish proclaiming Filippo as his, evidently influenced by Skull’s flawed and selfish logic-‘finders keepers’. Michele also behaves in that manner due to the lack of exposure of such situations. This is the only way he knows how to handle the ‘secret discovery’. Michele observes the discovery of a boy in a hole as a mysterious adventure that he must solve. But the height of Michele’s developing maturity is exposed through the continual visits to Filippo. Michele takes responsibility for Filippo’s wellbeing by ‘bathing his eyes’. The flaws of the adults force Michele to lose his rightful youth and take on the problems of adulthood. The adults in the novel have no redeeming justifications as to why they kidnapped and caused Filippo to become a ‘tormented soul’. Maturity may result in betraying promises in order to do the right thing. Despite Michele being obligated to his father, he recognises the wrong his parents have committed. Michele’s ‘oath was crumbling away’. He combats his fears and is ‘not scared of anything’ in attempt to save Filippo from his ominous death. Michele is punished for trying to do the moral thing. Michele is a character who demonstrations a significant transition from naivety to maturity. While Michele is obtaining maturity the adults are losing it by betraying their duty of parenthood and morality. Innocence no longer exists in Michele’s world because he has been exposed to the heinous realities of the world. Michele is able to distinguish the difference between reality and imagination and realises ‘it’s men you should be afraid of, not monsters’.